Home Private Equity The effects of corporate investment and public grants on climate and energy...

The effects of corporate investment and public grants on climate and energy startup outcomes

19
0

  • Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5°C Goal in Reach; (IEA, 2023); https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/d954f15d-36c5-41b9-a693-9b74daef59cc/NetZeroRoadmap_AGlobalPathwaytoKeepthe1.5CGoalinReach-2023Update.pdf

  • Gaddy, B. E., Sivaram, V., Jones, T. B. & Wayman, L. Venture capital and cleantech: the wrong model for energy innovation. Energy Policy 102, 385–395 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Doblinger, C., Surana, K. & Anadon, L. D. Governments as partners: the role of alliances in U.S. cleantech startup innovation. Res. Policy 48, 1458–1475 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shinkle, G. A. & Suchard, J.-A. Innovation in newly public firms: the influence of government grants, venture capital, and private equity. Aust. J. Manage. 44, 248–281 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van den Heuvel, M. & Popp, D. The Role of Venture Capital and Governments in Clean Energy: Lessons from the First Cleantech Bubble (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022); https://doi.org/10.3386/w29919

  • Migendt, M., Polzin, F., Schock, F., Täube, F. A. & von Flotow, P. Beyond venture capital: an exploratory study of the finance-innovation-policy nexus in cleantech. Ind. Corp. Change 26, 973–996 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chan, G., Goldstein, A. P., Bin-Nun, A., Diaz Anadon, L. & Narayanamurti, V. Six principles for energy innovation. Nature 552, 25–27 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Surana, K. et al. Regional Clean Energy Innovation (Energy Futures Initiative & Univ. of Maryland Global Sustainability Initiative, 2020); https://doi.org/10.13016/1BFC-DG1G

  • Surana, K. et al. The role of corporate investment in start-ups for climate-tech innovation. Joule https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.02.017 (2023).

  • Goldstein, A., Doblinger, C., Baker, E. & Anadón, L. D. Patenting and business outcomes for cleantech startups funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. Nat. Energy 5, 803–810 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Howell, S. T. Financing innovation: evidence from R&D grants. Am. Econ. Rev. 107, 1136–1164 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mazzucato, M. & Semieniuk, G. Financing renewable energy: who is financing what and why it matters. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 127, 8–22 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Foray, D., Mowery, D. C. & Nelson, R. R. Public R&D and social challenges: what lessons from mission R&D programs? Res. Policy 41, 1697–1702 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rossi, M., Festa, G., Solima, L. & Popa, S. Financing knowledge-intensive enterprises: evidence from CVCs in the US. J. Technol. Transf. 42, 338–353 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chesbrough, H. W. Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harv. Bus. Rev. 80, 90–99 (2002).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Benson, D. & Ziedonis, R. H. Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organ. Sci. 20, 329–351 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hegeman, P. D. & Sørheim, R. Why do they do it? Corporate venture capital investments in cleantech startups. J. Clean. Prod. 294, 126315 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dushnitsky, G. & Lenox, M. J. When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? J. Bus. Venturing 21, 753–772 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cunningham, C., Ederer, F. & Ma, S. Killer acquisitions. J. Polit. Econ. 129, 649–702 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maula, M., Autio, E. & Murray, G. Corporate venture capitalists and independent venture capitalists: what do they know, who do they know and should entrepreneurs care? Venture Cap. 7, 3–21 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alvarez-Garrido, E. & Dushnitsky, G. Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs: comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs. Strategic Manage. J. 37, 819–834 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maula, M. V. J., Autio, E. & Murray, G. C. Corporate venture capital and the balance of risks and rewards for portfolio companies. Spec. Issue Corp. Entrep. 24, 274–286 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Yao, T. & O’Neill, H. Venture capital exit pressure and venture exit: a board perspective. Strategic Manage. J. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3432 (2022).

  • Masulis, R. W. & Nahata, R. Venture capital conflicts of interest: evidence from acquisitions of venture-backed firms. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 46, 395–430 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • i3 Cleantech Group I3 Database (i3, 2024); https://i3connect.com

  • Park, H. D. & Steensma, H. K. When does corporate venture capital add value for new ventures? Strategic Manage. J. 33, 1–22 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Momtaz, P. P. Econometric models of duration data in entrepreneurship with an application to start-ups’ time-to-funding by venture capitalists (VCs). J. Appl. Stat. 48, 2673–2694 (2021).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Therneau, T., Crowson, C. & Atkinson, E. Using Time Dependent Covariates and Time Dependent Coefficients in the Cox Model (Comprehensive R Archive Network, 2022); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/vignettes/timedep.pdf

  • Cook, R. J & Lawless, J. F. The Statistical Analysis of Recurrent Events; Statistics for Biology and Health (Springer, 2007).

  • Cornelli, G., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L. & Merrouche, O. Climate Tech 2.0: Social Efficiency Versus Private Returns BIS Working Paper number 1072 (Bank for International Settlements, 2023); https://www.bis.org/publ/work1072.pdf

  • Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (US House, 2022); https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376

  • Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (US House, 2021); https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3684/text

  • Rozansky, R. Becoming America’s Seed Fund: Why NSF’s SBIR Program Should Be a Model for the Rest of Government (Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, 2019); https://itif.org/publications/2019/09/26/becoming-americas-seed-fund-why-nsfs-sbir-program-should-be-model-rest/

  • Kurowski, S. From atoms to bits: resource mobilization of non-digital, hybrid, and digital cleantech startups. Heliyon 10, e23697 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mazza, P. & Shuwaikh, F. Industry-relatedness, geographic proximity and strategic decisions of corporate and independent venture capital-backed companies. J. Small Bus. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2022.2108432 (2022).

  • Sjöholm, F. Navigating the New Normal: The European Union’s Changing Stance on Globalization in the Era of Trade Conflicts IFN Working Paper number 1466 (Research Institute of Industrial Economics, 2023); https://www.ifn.se/media/p34dyzls/wp1466.pdf

  • Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D. & Eisenhardt, K. M. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Adm. Sci. Q. 53, 295–332 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Le Marois, J.-B. & Bennett, S. Tracking Clean Energy Innovation (IEA, 2020); https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-clean-energy-innovation

  • Belcher, K., Maitra, M., Pizzuto, E., Donovan, D. & Oftedal, E. The Future of Climate Tech (Silicon Valley Bank, 2021); https://www.svb.com/globalassets/trendsandinsights/reports/future-of-climate/svb-future-of-climate-tech-report.pdf

  • State of Climate Tech 2021 (PwC, 2021).

  • Clean Energy Innovation (IEA, 2020); https://www.iea.org/reports/clean-energy-innovation

  • Global Climate Tech Venture Capital–Full Year 2021 (HolonIQ, 2022); https://www.holoniq.com/notes/global-climatetech-vc-report-full-year-2021/

  • Climate Tech Investment Trends–Five Years on Since the Paris Agreement (Dealroom.co, 2021); https://dealroom.co/blog/climate-tech-investment-trends

  • Venture Capital, PE Invest $53.7 Billion in Climate Tech (BloombergNEF, 2022); https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/venture-capital-pe-invest-53-7-billion-in-climate-tech/

  • Baker, C. Patentsview: An R Client to the ‘PatentsView’ API version 0.3.0 (2021); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/patentsview/index.html

  • Kassambara, A., Kosinski, M. & Biecek, P. Survminer: Drawing Survival Curves Using ‘Ggplot2’ version 0.4.9 (2021); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survminer/index.html

  • Therneau, T. M. & Grambsch, P. M. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model (Springer, 2001).

  • Keogh, D. & K.N. Johnson, D. Survival of the funded: econometric analysis of startup longevity and success. J. Entrepreneurship. Manage. Innovation 17, 29–49 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saxenian, A. Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. Calif. Manage. Rev. 33, 89–112 (1990).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guzman, J. & Stern, S. Where is Silicon Valley? Science 347, 606–609 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here